"The Aristocrats" and how to think with statistics
Now that I have just about finished offering my new class
for the first time (how to be an educated consumer of statistics & data),
it occurs to me that teaching is a lot like stand-up comedy. Classes need to be
workshopped to really be effective. I just debuted 37 hours of material. Take
that Louie C. K.!
It also makes me wonder what comedians think is the optimal audience
size? Too small and too big both seem problematic. For a class I think it’s
around 25. Comedians must have some wisdom here. I bet it is the same for a
class and for a stand-up show.
I decided to watch The Aristocrats to do some
research.
I want to tell the students about my theory (that classes
need to be workshopped) so they will understand what has been going on the last
15 weeks. I also kind of want to tell them about the movie (not assign it, just
mention it). It’s really funny after all. But no way. I’m nervous even telling
you guys, and you are the responsible internet community. It’s not so much I’m
afraid of getting in trouble, though that would seem a strong possibility.
No, the reason I won’t tell my class about the movie is
because I am concerned about their tender sensibilities. Maybe it’s just this
group (it’s been awhile since I’ve taught undergrads) and partially it is
Wisconsin, but they seem awfully innocent and naïve. I just imagine them
breaking down in tears at the obscenity. I know about campus sexual mores. I’ve
also watched Game of Thrones with my own teen daughter, so I have a pretty high
threshold. But this crosses a lot of lines.
Upon further reflection (you can’t see, but I’ve been
working on this post for days, which makes it seem even more obsessive): I
broke down my very small class into different demographics to try to parcel out
the variance. I discovered that the three female students who wear hijabs were
really driving the effect. In this political climate, it has got to be rough to
be a Muslim student (In the actual climate, maybe not so bad. It’s been cold
this spring and a hijab could help keep you toasty.) While there are pros and
cons to feeling like an outsider to the dominant campus culture, it’s probably
not nice to be reminded of one’s disconnect unnecessarily.
Here is what I’m thinking about. Let’s say I do tell the
class about this funny movie that contains graphic descriptions of incest,
bestiality, and coprophagy. A student might think, “Not for me.” Great. Good
decision. But an observant Muslim student might think, “Not for me because I am
an observant Muslim student. Another instance where I am disconnected and
missing out on the dominant culture. My beliefs and culture are important to
me, so it’s worth it. But there is a cost.” (You can see my students are very
thoughtful. It’s a good class.). Here’s another scenario. A student decides,
“It’s just a movie. Let’s see what all the fun is about.” They get about 10
minutes in as George Carlin gets to his version and are horrified. “This is
what people think is funny? I am confirmed in my outsider status.” And that’s
not right either. Not everyone thinks this is funny, and that’s kind of the
point.
What makes this movie work (if it works) is the thrill of
being naughty, a mild reveling in perversity. You of have to understand how the
comedians see themselves and this joke with respect to American culture. They
don’t think, “Everyone believes this is funny so, let’s joke about it.” They
think, “Everyone believes this is horrible, so let’s joke about it.” Being in
on the joke requires a careful triangulation of what is an is not acceptable
and accepted. (If it is not already clear, this is a complex movie, and not one
to bring the kids. They have ratings for a reason.).
What I would like to feel, in the end, is that my students
are more or less grown ups and they are owed the respect to be allowed to
decide for themselves. But to do that, I have to give them the facts about what
the movie is and why it might be good to watch or not (I should probably just
have them read my blog). My problem is
that I am trying to come up with a trigger warning. “Watching this movie may
make you feel you are weird for not finding it funny, and that you are an
outsider. Don’t feel that way.” (I wouldn’t put it like that.)
Those of you who know me, meaning my wife and daughters,
know I have been pretty dismissive and patronizing about the whole idea of
trigger warnings. “It’s just a book.” Or “Get over it.” I don’t like changing my mind, so I’m still
not going to turn into an advocate. But now I understand (and endorse) one
function of trigger warnings. “Don’t think that people think this stuff is OK
or normal. Just because you see/hear/read about it, doesn’t mean people think
it is fine. In fact, the reason you are probably seeing/hearing/reading about
it is because the author wants to make the point it is NOT fine.” That seems
like a really good trigger warning, and a message we really ought to give to
people if we point them to this stuff.
I do kind of want to end the last day by doing the Drew Carey
snap and saying:
…and that is, “How to Think With
Statistics”
Comments
Post a Comment